은/는 vs 이/가: A Formal Guide to Korean Topic and Subject Markers

course thumb 6
picture of korean night beach

은/는 vs 이/가: A Formal Guide to Korean Topic and Subject Markers

This article explains the Korean particles 은/는 and 이/가 in a formal and practical manner. It defines core meanings, offers minimal pairs, and presents distributional rules that support accurate writing. Examples are original and designed for English-speaking learners. The tone is consistent and objective.

Definition and scope

이/가 marks a grammatical subject and often introduces new or focal information. 은/는 marks a topic or contrast frame and often refers to known, accessible, or deliberately contrasted information. Both particles attach to nouns and do not inflect for tense or politeness. Writers choose between them according to discourse status and emphasis.

Minimal pairs: new vs. known information

Introducing new information with 이/가

When the sentence presents newsworthy or newly highlighted content, 이/가 is preferred.

  • 새 공지 올라왔습니다. — A new announcement has been posted.
  • 문제 원인 확인되었습니다. — The cause has been identified.

Framing known or contrasted content with 은/는

When the sentence sets a frame, shifts topic, or contrasts alternatives, 은/는 is used.

  • 오늘 일정이 변동되었습니다. — As for today, the schedule changed.
  • 해당 항목 필수입니다. — This item, for its part, is mandatory.

Focus and contrast in assertions

Contrastive reading of 은/는

은/는 can imply an unspoken alternative and restrict the claim to the topic. This reading is frequent in comparisons and policy notes.

  • 배송료 무료입니다. — The shipping fee is free (other fees may not be).

Exhaustive tendency of 이/가

In certain contexts, 이/가 reads as “it is X (and not Y).” It suits answers to selection questions and responsibility statements.

  • 담당자 승인했습니다. — It is the manager who approved it.

Predicate type and common environments

Existence, appearance, and events

Event reports, first mentions, and existence statements usually take 이/가.

  • 오류 발생했습니다. — An error occurred.
  • 자리 없습니다. — There is no seat.

General statements and evaluations

Summaries, general truths, and evaluations about a set commonly take 은/는.

  • 이 서비스 안정적입니다. — As for this service, it is stable.
  • 한국 겨울 건조합니다. — Korean winters, in general, are dry.

Questions, answers, and information flow

Answering “what happened?” with 이/가

When the predicate carries the informational peak, 이/가 aligns with the focus.

  • 누가 보고했습니까? — 김 팀장 보고했습니다. — Who reported it? Manager Kim did.

Maintaining a topic with 은/는

When the topic remains constant across sentences, 은/는 preserves coherence.

  • 해당 부서 계획을 제출했습니다. 일정 다음 주에 확정됩니다.

Negation, emphasis, and polarity

Negation with identification

Negative identification places focus on the subject; 이/가 is natural. Contrastive framing uses 은/는.

  • 원인 아닙니다. — It is not the cause.
  • 시간 문제가 아닙니다. — As for time, it is not the issue.

Emphatic confirmation

Affirmations that answer doubts can use 이/가 for tight focus.

  • 해결책 맞습니다. — This solution is correct.

Topic resets and contrastive paragraphs

Paragraph-initial topics with 은/는

At the start of a paragraph, 은/는 flags the next set of statements as belonging to the topic. This improves readability in guides and reports.

  • 보안 정책 다음 원칙을 따릅니다. — The security policy follows these principles.

Switching topics responsibly

When a paragraph changes scope, a new 은/는 topic prevents ambiguity between references.

  • 모바일 앱 업데이트가 완료되었습니다. 웹 버전 내일 적용됩니다.

Common learner errors and precise fixes

Using 은/는 for first mentions

Error: 새 공지 올라왔습니다. (first mention) Fix: 새 공지 올라왔습니다.

Dropping contrast that the context requires

Error: 주말 가능합니다. (schedule comparison context) Fix: 주말 가능합니다.

Overusing 이/가 in general statements

Error: 이 매뉴얼 의무입니다. (policy tone) Fix: 이 매뉴얼 의무입니다.

Interaction with other particles

Stacking with topic and subject

Only one of 은/는 or 이/가 appears on the same noun phrase. When emphasis requires both notions, writers restructure the sentence rather than stack markers.

Topic with case-marked phrases

Topicalization of other case-marked phrases is possible but should be controlled in formal prose to avoid heavy openings.

  • 비용 회사 부담합니다. — As for the cost, the company bears it.

Applied practice (original)

Task 1: Choose the marker

  1. ( ) 문제가 보고되었습니다. → 문제가 보고되었습니다: 이/가.
  2. ( ) 접속은 안정적입니다. → 접속 안정적입니다: 은/는.
  3. ( ) 담당자가 승인했습니다. → 담당자 승인했습니다: 이/가.

Task 2: Rewrite for contrast

  1. 저녁이 가능합니다 → 저녁 가능합니다.
  2. 이 모델이 빠릅니다 → 이 모델 빠릅니다. (comparison context)

Task 3: Repair first mention

  1. 새 일정 등록되었습니다 → 새 일정 등록되었습니다.

Summary and conclusion

이/가 presents subjects as new or focal information and fits existence, events, and precise identification. 은/는 frames topics, expresses contrast, and supports summaries and general statements. Correct selection depends on information flow, paragraph structure, and the communicative goal of each sentence. Consistent application improves readability and prevents unintended emphasis in formal Korean prose.

Related Post

Table of Contents